Disclaimer | LogIn     
1546-2080 Online :: 1546-203X Print
A New Pitfall in Patenting Nanomaterial Manufacturing: The Need for Reform
Volume 3, Issue 4

J. Steven Rutt, Foley & Lardner, L.L.P.
Leon Radomsky, Foley & Lardner, L.L.P.
Stephen B. Maebius, Foley & Lardner, L.L.P.

A recent Federal Circuit holding in Zoltek v. United States exposes an important gap in the U.S. legislative scheme for patent infringement related to international outsourcing and federal contracting. The gap, arising because of highly formalistic reasoning from the Federal Circuit, will impact U.S. nanomaterials companies among others. The gap arises when the patent owner has a method of making patent, and the method of making is done outside the U.S. as part of federal contracting. Congress previously had amended the patent statute to provide 35 U.S.C. § 271(g) to help patent holders, but in doing so had failed to clearly articulate whether 271(g) should apply to infringement under federal contracts. In a divided opinion, the Federal Circuit rejected attempts to close the gap by a constitutional takings analysis. Hence, reform of the legislative scheme is urgently needed.

Full Text (PDF)
Home   :   Aims & Scope    :   Editorial Board    :   Subscriptions   :   Partnerships  :   Contact Us
Nanotechnology Law & Business Copyright 2005